Montana Election Not Counted, It Was Calculated

“The election was not counted, it was calculated, and we were on cruise control,” said Draza Smith, an electrical and computer engineer, who formerly worked at Sandia National Labs focusing on Cyber and Grid Security.

Smith explored the 2020 election Edison Research data, with supplementation by The Associated Press data from The New York Times, digging into a proportion of ballots voting for each candidate as the results came in, batch by batch. Her investigations indicate that results in many states are most likely controlled and changed via a computer algorithm with a “data set point”.

In her professional opinion, the algorithm has been programmed to achieve a specific percentage of votes in each location, pushing the votes up or down during the count in order to reach that target outcome. 

According to ElectionFraud20.org, “She has described this algorithm to that of a ‘PID Controller’ or a car’s cruise control, where, after a specific target speed has been set, the car’s engine adjusts up or down to reach that target. She identified several cases where the target was adjusted mid-way through the ballot counting process (potentially based on the results in other states, such as after Florida was announced as a win for Trump). It appears that all batches following this adjustment show a shift in the results as the algorithm now aims for the new target value.”

The data used to create Montana’s analysis and charts were gathered from the New York Times’ election data website. The election reporting time series used for analysis is freely available to the public. The Edison Data is the data used by many TV stations and web pages to provide real-time updates on the vote count on election night.

Smith recently completed her doctoral work in computer engineering, with the defense of her Ph.D. dissertation on the horizon. She explains her process in the “LadyDraza PID Cruise Control North Dakota”.